
Two Microsoft Licensing Paths
One Partner Accountable for the Outcome.
Take Control of Your Microsoft Environment.
What the Numbers Show
1,000-seat example, EA Replacement + Microsoft Enterprise Support
Post-2025 EA discounts have flattened across all tiers. This comparison reflects current market conditions. Your team manages support and escalation internally.A 3-year EA-like pricing structure suits your planning cycle.
EA Off-Ramp pricing anchor
Structured 15 / 10 / 5% stepped discounts against Level A list pricing on EA renewals. Organizations that previously held 6 to 12% volume discounts are losing them entirely under the new EA structure. The EA Off-Ramp restores that structure without requiring a support purchase.
Why DCG over a large LSP or distributor
LSPs and distributors sell licenses. They do not own what happens after. When an escalation stalls, a support case sits open, or Azure spend drifts, they refer you back to Microsoft. DCG is built differently. Senior engineers handle 93% of cases in-house. One parter is accountable for your licensing outcome and your support outcome. That level of accountability is not something large-scale providers can profitably sustain. It is the only model DCG runs.
Not ready to commit? Start with the License Optimization Accelerator. A diagnostic that maps your current licensing position against your actual deployment. The full fee applies toward whichever path you go down.
Why This Decision Matters Now
Microsoft eliminated EA volume discount tiers (Levels B/C/D) in November 2025. All EA renewals now default to Level A list pricing, a 50 to 70% compression of discounts organizations previously relied on. MCA-E migration began March 2026, and organizations under 2,400 seats may no longer be offered an EA renewal. CSP is now the primary licensing path for most of DCG's target market.

%202.png)
.png)


