Whitepaper

Pay For What You Use. Nothing Else.
Why should your enterprise support agreement follow consumption and not your Microsoft spend curve.
Download the Whitepaper (PDF, opens in a new tab)What You’ll Learn
A CFO-ready case for why Microsoft's Unified Support pricing model works against you and what a consumption-aligned alternative actually looks like.
THE PROBLEM
Why Unified Support Costs Keep Rising, Even When Usage Drops
Microsoft prices Unified as a percentage of your total Microsoft spend, not the cases you opened, or engineering hours consumed. Your bill goes up every time licensing grows, regardless of support activity
THE BLIND SPOT
What Procurement, Finance & IT Can't See on the Invoice
Unified invoices show one large number. No case-level breakdown, no severity mix, no engineering effort. This white paper documents why that opacity costs enterprises millions in avoidable spend.
THE MODEL
How a Consumption-Based Support Agreement Actually Works
Four pillars of a smarter model: usage visibility, predictable cost bands, engineering accountability, and negotiation grounded in data, not percentage haggling.
THE NEXT STEP
Two Steps to Evaluate Your Current Support Contract Today
Establish your real consumption baseline, then model what a usage-aligned contract would have cost for the same demand pattern, no full redesign required.
Who Should Read This Whitepaper?
- CFOs and Finance Leaders who need to reconcile the Unified line item against actual support ROI and build a defensible investment case
- Procurement and Vendor Management teams who want to move from percentage-rate haggling to evidence-based negotiation on scope, service levels, and usage bands
- IT and Operations Leaders whose teams open tickets and manage escalations but never see a clear line from those patterns to what they cost the business
- CIOs and Technology Executives evaluating whether to renew, renegotiate, or replace a Unified Support agreement at the next contract cycle
- Finance Business Partners and Budget Owners who are tired of forecasting support as a derivative of licensing spend rather than as a service with its own economics



