Why Transactional CSP is a Compliance Risk

CSP has become the practical Microsoft licensing path for many organizations moving away from EA. But CSP is just the purchasing vehicle. It does not define the level of governance, visibility, optimization, or accountability your organization receives after the agreement is signed!
A distributor-sourced or transactional Cloud Solutions Provider (CSP) relationship may fulfill the licensing requirement. It can process the order, manage the transaction, and provide a route into CSP. But it does not automatically solve the governance problem that made the Microsoft licensing shift difficult in the first place.
A governed CSP relationship helps manage your entire Microsoft environment as an ongoing discipline for cost, compliance, and accountability. You get an accountable partner that creates visibility into:

• what is being used
• where spend is drifting  
• what needs to be optimized  
• who is accountable between renewals

not just a vehicle for cheaper Microsoft purchases.

Transactional CSP vs. Governed CSP

*SOC II Type 2 certification is one governance signal, and many CSPs may also hold it, but the distinction comes from DCG’s overall accountability model.
‍

What the Compliance Gap Means in Practice

Several distributor-or LSP-sourced CSPs may pass a vendor review, but whether they are truly accountable for how your Microsoft environment is governed after the transaction can become a compliance gap.

The table above shows where those gaps usually appear:

• Without continuous right-sizing, unused licenses and over-provisioned users can stay hidden between renewals.
• Without licensing footprint visibility, Procurement and Finance have less confidence in what is being purchased, used, or wasted.
• Without a named accountable partner, billing, licensing, support, and optimization issues can bounce between internal teams, Microsoft, and the reseller.
• Without governance documentation, the internal case becomes harder to defend during budget, compliance, or renewal reviews.
• Without a fixed-cost support structure, support costs can continue to grow as Microsoft spend grows.

DCG’s governed CSP model closes that accountability gap by integrating licensing visibility, optimization, support structure, documentation, and named ownership into a single Microsoft-focused operating model.

Compare DCG’s EA Off-Ramp and EA Replacement paths to understand how governed Microsoft licensing changes the total-cost conversation across CSP, Enterprise Support, and operational accountability.

‍